Federal Circuit Deals Blow to Texas Patent-Trolls
In a ruling issued earlier today, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals admonished Eastern District of Texas Federal Judge Rodney Gilstrap for abusing his discretion in refusing to transfer venue of a patent infringement lawsuit. Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion cracking down on venue shopping in patent infringement claims, ruling that a defendant could only be sued in its state of incorporation or where it has “a regular and established place of business.” Venue shopping has enabled so-called patent trolls to bring lawsuits in favorable courts, one of the most notorious of which is the Eastern District of Texas in Marshall. In the Cray case, Judge Gilstrap ruled that venue in the Eastern District was proper because the company, a supercomputer manufacturer based in Seattle, had single salesperson working out of his home in the Eastern District, despite the fact that the employee did not sell any Cray products in the district and worked mainly on clients in the eastern U.S. The case will now return to the district court for transfer to another district with proper venue.
Want new articles directly to your inbox?
Subscribe to our Publishing Service.
Corpus Christi Court of Appeals Declines to Vacate New Trial Order Where Defense Attorney Argued That Plaintiffs Engaged in “Attorney Shakedown”
In re Space Exploration Technologies Corp. and Lauren Krueger (No. 13-24-00042-CV; March 28, 2024) arose from a personal injury lawsuit stemming from an automobile accident. The case went to a jury, which found defendant Krueger was negligent but not acting within the...
SCOTX Mandamuses El Paso Trial Court for Denying Defense Motions to Admit Out-of State Attorneys Pro Hoc Vice
In a case that left us rolling our eyes over how such an absurdly ridiculous trial court ruling had to be fixed by the highest court in the state, the Texas Supreme Court has (with great restraint) granted mandamus ordering an El Paso trial court to vacate its order...
Houston [1st] Court of Appeals Sides With Pipeline in Landowner Challenge to Eminent Domain Authority
In a case with an odd procedural posture, the Houston [1st] Court of Appeals has affirmed a trial court order granting partial summary judgment to a pipeline company and denying the landowners’ motion for a temporary junction. Right-Way Sand Co. a/k/a Right Way Sand,...