AG Paxton Commends U.S. District Court Ruling That Upholds Texas’ Time-Honored System of Statewide Judicial Elections

by TCJL | Sep 13, 2018 | info

Attorney General Ken Paxton today applauded a decision by the U.S. District Court in Corpus Christi upholding the well-established practice of statewide judicial elections for the Texas Supreme Court and Court of Criminal Appeals. The court ruled that the system fully complies with voting rights’ laws.“Texans have been choosing the courts’ highest appellate judges in statewide elections for 142 years, and this system supports the state’s interest in maintaining judicial accountability and independence,” Attorney General Paxton said. “The system was enshrined in the Texas Constitution in 1867 and allows every Texas voter to vote for every candidate seeking a seat on the state’s two highest courts.”A lawsuit against the state of Texas sought to divide the two highest courts into single-member judicial districts. But such a change would mean voters would only be able to vote for one seat on each high court instead of casting a ballot for all 18 seats. The court concluded that the plaintiffs that had standing “have not satisfied their burden to show that the voting methodology results in a denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color.”View a copy of the U.S. District Court ruling here: https://bit.ly/2QjOpeF

Want new articles directly to your inbox?
Subscribe to our Publishing Service.

Dallas Court of Appeals Reverses TC Denial of Chapter 74 Motion to Dismiss Negligence and Death Claims Against Hospice Provider

In a medical negligence case of involving the scope of the statutory definition of a health care liability claim, the Dallas Court of Appeals has reversed a trial court order denying a hospice providers motion to dismiss negligence and wrongful death claims for...

Business Court Awards Specific Performance, Attorney’s Fees in Dispute Over Buy-Sell Option Clause in Company Agreement

The Business Court has granted a defense motion for summary judgment in a dispute over the enforceability of a buy-sell option clause in three nearly identical company agreements. The court awarded the defendant specific performance and attorney’s fees. Michael D....

Waco Court of Appeals Decides Case With Competing Trial Court Orders Stating Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law

In a case raising the issue of the status of conflicting trial court orders stating findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Waco Court of Appeals has held that the trial court intended to sign the findings and conclusions that supported the judgment. Dudley...

AG Paxton Commends U.S. District Court Ruling That Upholds Texas’ Time-Honored System of Statewide Judicial Elections

AG Paxton Commends U.S. District Court Ruling That Upholds Texas’ Time-Honored System of Statewide Judicial Elections

AG Paxton Commends U.S. District Court Ruling That Upholds Texas’ Time-Honored System of Statewide Judicial Elections

Dallas Court of Appeals Reverses TC Denial of Chapter 74 Motion to Dismiss Negligence and Death Claims Against Hospice Provider

Business Court Awards Specific Performance, Attorney’s Fees in Dispute Over Buy-Sell Option Clause in Company Agreement

Waco Court of Appeals Decides Case With Competing Trial Court Orders Stating Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law

Pin It on Pinterest