Federal Circuit Deals Blow to Texas Patent-Trolls

by | Sep 27, 2017 | Court Decisions, Judiciary

In a ruling issued earlier today, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals admonished Eastern District of Texas Federal Judge Rodney Gilstrap for abusing his discretion in refusing to transfer venue of a patent infringement lawsuit. Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion cracking down on venue shopping in patent infringement claims, ruling that a defendant could only be sued in its state of incorporation or where it has “a regular and established place of business.” Venue shopping has enabled so-called patent trolls to bring lawsuits in favorable courts, one of the most notorious of which is the Eastern District of Texas in Marshall. In the Cray case, Judge Gilstrap ruled that venue in the Eastern District was proper because the company, a supercomputer manufacturer based in Seattle, had single salesperson working out of his home in the Eastern District, despite the fact that the employee did not sell any Cray products in the district and worked mainly on clients in the eastern U.S. The case will now return to the district court for transfer to another district with proper venue.

Want new articles directly to your inbox?
Subscribe to our Publishing Service.

9 + 14 =

TCJL Files Brief in Oil and Gas Lease Case

TCJL today filed an amicus curiae brief in a case involving the interpretation of an offset well clause in an oil and gas lease. The case, Rosetta Resources Operating, L.P. v. Kevin Martin, Jamie Martin, and Ashley Lusk (20-0898), has a peculiar history that includes...

TAM Announces Legislative Program

TCJL's sister organization the Texas Association of Manufacturers (TAM) has designated pandemic liability protection as one of its top three legislative priorities this session. “Pandemic economic recovery, competitiveness and job growth are at the core of our...

TCJL Files Amicus Brief in Second Paid or Incurred Case

TCJL has filed an amicus curiae brief with the Texas Supreme Court in a second case in which a defendant was denied discovery of relevant evidence of the reasonableness of medical bills. Similar to In re K&L Auto Crushers LLC (No. 19-1022), in which TCJL filed a...

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This