Federal Circuit Deals Blow to Texas Patent-Trolls

In a ruling issued earlier today, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals admonished Eastern District of Texas Federal Judge Rodney Gilstrap for abusing his discretion in refusing to transfer venue of a patent infringement lawsuit. Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion cracking down on venue shopping in patent infringement claims, ruling that a defendant could only be sued in its state of incorporation or where it has “a regular and established place of business.” Venue shopping has enabled so-called patent trolls to bring lawsuits in favorable courts, one of the most notorious of which is the Eastern District of Texas in Marshall. In the Cray case, Judge Gilstrap ruled that venue in the Eastern District was proper because the company, a supercomputer manufacturer based in Seattle, had single salesperson working out of his home in the Eastern District, despite the fact that the employee did not sell any Cray products in the district and worked mainly on clients in the eastern U.S. The case will now return to the district court for transfer to another district with proper venue.
Want new articles directly to your inbox?
Subscribe to our Publishing Service.
SCOTX Affirms Dallas Court of Appeals Opinion Allowing Pilot Union Lawsuit Against Boeing to Go Forward in State Court
The Texas Supreme Court has affirmed a Dallas Court of Appeals’ decision holding that the federal Railway Labor Act (RLA)(45 USC § 151a) does not pre-empt a pilots association’s suit against Boeing in a dispute over the pilots’ agreement to fly the 737 MAX aircraft....
SCOTX Mandamuses Houston [14th] Court of Appeals to Consider Whether Judgment Debtor Posted Adequate Alternative Security
In a per curiam opinion, SCOTX sent the matter back to the court of appeals. Issue one was the dispute over ex-husband’s net worth. After detailing the applicable statutes (§§ 52.006, .007) and TRAP 24.1 and 24.2, the Court noted that the parties agreed that the trial...
SCOTX Reverses Plainly Erroneous El Paso Court of Appeals Decision in Commercial Trucking Case
The Texas Supreme Court has reversed a divided El Paso Court of Appeals’ ruling that a plaintiff in a commercial trucking case presented more than a scintilla of evidence to overcome defendants’ no-evidence summary judgment motion where plaintiff didn’t have any...