Rep. Capriglione, Senator Buckingham File Legislation Aimed at Deceptive Attorney Advertising
Rep. Capriglione, Senator Buckingham File Legislation Aimed at Deceptive Attorney Advertising
Rep. Giovanni Capriglione (R-Southlake) and Sen. Dawn Buckingham (R-Lakeway) have filed companion legislation to prohibit advertisements for legal services that encourage consumers to stop taking their prescribed medications. HB 2251 and SB 1189 bar advertisements that: (1) present the advertisement as a “health alert,” “medical alert,” “consumer alert,” “public health announcement,” or similar phrase; (2) display the logo of a federal or state agency to suggest affiliation with or sponsorship by the agency; or (3) uses the term “recall” to refer to a product that has not been recalled by any agency or by agreement of the agency and the manufacturer.
The bills further require an advertisement to identify as a paid advertisement for legal services, disclose the identity of the attorney or law firm that will provide legal services. If the sponsor of the advertisement is not legally authorized to provide legal services to the person who responds to the advertisement, the ad must also disclose the manner in which the case will be referred to an attorney or law firm. This provision is aimed at “bundlers” or “aggregators” who use the advertisements to solicit clients, receive their health care information, and then sell the cases to a firm that will perform the work.
Finally, the bills require a warning, if the advertisement concerns a prescription drug approved by the FDA, that a person should not stop taking the drug without consulting the person’s physician and that stopping a drug may cause injury or death. The advertisement must disclose that a drug or medical device is FDA approved, unless the product has been recalled or withdrawn. The attorney general and prosecuting attorneys have enforcement authority and can impose civil penalties for violations, as well as injunctive relief.
TCJL wholeheartedly supports this common sense approach to stopping attorney advertising that is misleading, poses a potential danger to consumers, and interferes with the physician-patient relationship. We applaud Representative Capriglione and Senator Buckingham for introducing this legislation, and to Senators Lucio, Creighton, and Fallon who are co-sponsoring the bill in the Senate.
Want new articles directly to your inbox?
Subscribe to our E-mail Notification Service.
El Paso Court of Appeals Grants Permissive Appeal, Rules That Res Judicata Does Not Bar Mineral Interest Owners Suit Against Producer
In a decision on a permissive appeal, the El Paso Court of Appeals has reversed a trial court summary judgment order determining that res judicata does not apply to a dispute over ownership of Loving County mineral interests. Ridgefield Permian Minerals, LLC and Jim...
In Concurring Opinion, Justice Young Points To Conflict Between Houston Courts of Appeals on Evidentiary Status of Superseded Admissions
In an opinion concurring with the Texas Supreme Court’s denial of a city’s petition for review in a Tort Claims Act case, Justice Evan Young pointed out a conflict between the First and Fourteenth Court of Appeals that the Court will eventually need to address. City...
In Concurrence, Justice Busby Takes Issue With El Paso Court of Appeals Majority in Subsurface Trespass Case
In a case with significant ramifications for the oil and gas industry which we first reported last January, the Texas Supreme Court has denied review of a split El Paso Court of Appeals decision holding that a mineral lessee does not have standing to sue a pipeline...