TCJL files brief in TWIA case
This week TCJL filed an amicus curiae brief in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals [Houston] in a case involving claims against the Texas Windstorm Insurance Association (TWIA) arising from Hurricane Ike in 2008. In this case the Dickinson Independent School District filed claims for wind damage to several school facilities, which TWIA adjusted and settled with the district. The district then made an additional claim against TWIA, which was likewise adjusted and settled. In both cases, the district provided to TWIA a sworn Proof of Loss establishing that the district’s total losses had been paid. The district subsequently filed suit against TWIA in 2012, four years after the storm and more than two years after TWIA initially settled the claim.
As our brief points out, the facts of this case “read like a catalogue of abuses specifically addressed in H.B. 3,” the TWIA reform legislation enacted by the Legislature in 2011. These include the appointment of an unqualified appraiser and possibly biased appraisal umpire, serious irregularities in the appraisal process (the inspections for which occurred more than five years after the storm), an appraisal award that exceeded the amount of damages claimed by the district by more than ten times, and the refusal of the trial judge to permit TWIA to introduce evidence of causation at trial in violation of the Texas Supreme Court’s decision in State Farm Lloyds v. Johnson, 290 S.W.3d 886 (Tex. 2009).
TCJL argues that the Court of Appeals should view this appeal in light of the policy decisions made by the Legislature in 2011. In the face of overwhelming evidence of litigation abuses arising from TWIA litigation, the Legislature specifically addressed precisely the kind of gamesmanship and manipulation of the process that occurred in this case. As we state in our brief, “Although the law may have changed since this lawsuit was filed, the responsibility of the appellate courts to ensure that trial courts do not engage in practices that undermine the public’s faith in the basic fairness and impartiality of the civil justice system has not. Here the trial court refused to inquire into a plainly inappropriate appraisal process and directed TWIA to sit down and shut up. As the Earl of Leicester said to Elizabeth II about the botched execution of Mary, Queen of Scots, things were done there that should not have been done. It is up to this court to set them to right.”
The case is set for oral argument in Houston in the coming weeks.
Want new articles directly to your inbox?
Subscribe to our Publishing Service.
SCOTX Considering Review of Decision Holding That Nonprofit Health Organizations May Be Vicariously Liable for Physician’s Negligence
In a case in which the Texas Medical Association and Texas Hospital Association have taken opposing positions, the Texas Supreme Court has before it a petition for review of a Corpus Christi Court of Appeals decision holding that a nonprofit health organization that...
Dallas Court of Appeals Holds That $25 Million Supersedeas Cap Applies Per Judgment Debtor
Section 52.006, CPRC, governs the amount of a security for a money judgment that a judgment debtor must post in order to pursue an appeal. Generally the amount of this “supersedeas” bond equals the sum of the amount of compensatory damages awarded, interest for the...
San Antonio Court of Appeals Affirms TC Denial of TCPA Motion to Dismiss in Defamation Case
Consultants in Pain Medicine, PLLC and David Blanton v. Ellen Boyle Duncan, PLLC and Ellen Boyle Duncan, M.D.(No. 04-22-00479-CV; March 13, 2024) arose from a dispute between a pain-management medical practice (CIPM), its CEO (Blanton), and one its six physician...