TPLF: Third Party Litigation Funding

 


Supreme Court Advisory Committee
11-1-24 Agenda and Materials

 


Robert Levy Response to John Kim Opposition Memo

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download [138.56 KB]


Opposition Memo by John Kim

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download [267.49 KB]


October 7, 2024
Press Release

WASHINGTON – Congressman Darrell Issa (CA-48), Chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet, and Congressman Scott Fitzgerald (WI-05) introduced H.R. 9922, the Litigation Transparency Act of 2024, which requires the disclosure of parties receiving payment in civil lawsuits.


US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform

Grim Realities: Debunking Myths in Third-Party Litigation Funding


TCJL, US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform, Lawyers for Civil Justice Respond to Opposition

September 25, 2024

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download [347.25 KB]


Opposition Files Letter with Supreme Court Advisory Committee (“ILFA” International Legal Finance Association)

August 30, 2024

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download [288.52 KB]

This week, Chief Justice Nathan Hecht referred nine rule issues to the Supreme Court Advisory Committee (SCAC), including two items of particular interest to TCJL members.  Consistent with SCAC’s rules and processes, the issues will be referred to a subcommittee for review and recommendation.

Third Party Litigation Funding (TPLF)

In response to TCJL’s request to the Texas Supreme Court, the Supreme Court Advisory Committee (SCAC) will be reviewing the matter of Third-Party Litigation Funding (TPLF).  The request was sent from Chief Justice Nathan Hecht to SCAC’s Chairman Chip Babcock earlier today with the following instruction:

Third-Party Litigation Funding. The Court has received the attached correspondence regarding third-party litigation funding agreements. The Committee should review, advise whether the Court should adopt rules in connection with third-party litigation funding, and draft any recommended rules.

Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The TCJL Task Force on AI will follow this rule process closely, and TCJL will host a CLE on AI on November 7, 2024, in conjunction with our 38th Annual Meeting in Austin.

Artificial Intelligence. The State Bar of Texas’s Taskforce for Responsible AI in the Law has issued the attached interim report recommending potential changes to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 13 and Texas Rule of Evidence 901. The Committee should review, advise whether such amendments are necessary or desirable to account for artificial intelligence, and draft any recommended amendments.

The referral letter, including all nine issues and related attachments, appears below.  Please stay tuned for updates and relevant TCJL meeting notices, and please contact our office if you would like to participate in the AI or TPLF workgroups.  TCJL staff can be reached at info@tcjl.com or 512-320-0474.

SCAC Referral July 2024

TCJL Provides TPLF History to Supreme Court Advisory Committee

May 20, 2024

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download [3.88 MB]

 


In a letter to Chief Justice Hecht earlier this week, TCJL requested that rulemaking be initiated to require some form of disclosure of the existence of third-party litigation funding agreements to the court and parties under appropriate circumstances. Our letter asks the Chief Justice to refer the issue to the Supreme Court Advisory Committee for study and the promulgation of a proposed rule to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Though rulemaking through the SCAC can be a protracted process, it would put the very real and substantive ethical issues posed by TPLF before sitting judges, representatives of both sides of the trial bar, the State Bar of Texas, and in-house and external corporate counsel. If the Court refers our request, we can expect a robust and perhaps contentious debate over these issues and the extent to which TPLF agreements should be discoverable in a particular case and by whom. Our request makes no distinction between consumer and commercial litigation financing for the simple reason that the ethical considerations are the same.

You can read the letter below.

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download [1.30 MB]

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This